Smart Tax and Customs Integration and Compliance in Jordan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70568/ijdafs.3.1.2Keywords:
Smart Tax and Customs Integration, Financial Technology, Regulatory Technology, Perceived Administrative Efficiency, Tax Compliance, Sustainability, JordanAbstract
Digital connections between tax reporting and customs clearance create an opportunity to examine how financial information systems relate to firms’ compliance behaviour. This study examines the relationship between smart tax and customs integration and tax and customs compliance among Jordanian import–export companies, with perceived administrative efficiency as a mediator. It positions integration at the interface of digital accounting, financial technology and regulatory technology, while considering its implications for sustainability. The research uses a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design with a sample of 159 respondents. The proposed analysis applies partial least squares structural equation modelling to estimate the direct relationships and the indirect relationship through perceived administrative efficiency. The framework distinguishes the availability of connected digital functions from firms’ assessments of the administration that uses them. Sustainability is considered through potential improvements in the use of administrative resources, the reliability of public revenue processes and accountable institutional practice. Environmental benefits require separate evidence. The study develops a testable explanation of how integrated financial and regulatory information may support compliance, without treating digitalisation itself as proof of sustainable performance. PLS-SEM results based on the 159 respondents support all four hypotheses: smart tax and customs integration is positively associated with perceived administrative efficiency, perceived administrative efficiency is positively associated with compliance behaviour, integration retains a positive direct association with compliance once administrative efficiency is controlled for, and the indirect association through administrative efficiency is positive and statistically significant, consistent with partial mediation.
References
Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., Zetzsche, D. A., & Veidt, R. (2020). Sustainability, FinTech and financial inclusion. European Business Organization Law Review, 21(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00183-y
Bellon, M., Dabla-Norris, E., Khalid, S., & Lima, F. (2022). Digitalization to improve tax compliance: Evidence from VAT e-Invoicing in Peru. Journal of Public Economics, 210, Article 104661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104661
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Hasan, M., Hoque, A., Abedin, M. Z., & Gasbarro, D. (2024). FinTech and sustainable development: A systematic thematic analysis using human- and machine-generated processing. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, Article 103473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103473
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
Kochanova, A., Hasnain, Z., & Larson, B. (2020). Does e-government improve government capacity? Evidence from tax compliance costs, tax revenue, and public procurement competitiveness. The World Bank Economic Review, 34(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx024
Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Mascagni, G., Mengistu, A. T., & Woldeyes, F. B. (2021). Can ICTs increase tax compliance? Evidence on taxpayer responses to technological innovation in Ethiopia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 189, 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.06.007
Okunogbe, O., & Pouliquen, V. (2022). Technology, taxation, and corruption: Evidence from the introduction of electronic tax filing. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(1), 341–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200123
Pizzi, S., Corbo, L., & Caputo, A. (2021). Fintech and SMEs sustainable business models: Reflections and considerations for a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, Article 125217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125217
Puschmann, T. (2017). Fintech. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0464-6
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
Shubailat, O. M., Al-Zaqeba, M. A. A., Madi, A., & Khairi, K. F. (2024). Investigation the effect of digital taxation and digital accounting on customs efficiency and port sustainability. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.10.017
Ullah, S., & Begum, M. (2025). FinTech and financial sustainability: A mediating role of financial inclusion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 217, Article 124129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124129
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zoulikha Abdul kadir Benkaakaa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.